🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are able to create different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.